Quantcast

Illiteracy 101

2008.05.19 @ 20:08
  • 3.7 million of all NYC adults cannot read beyond a 5th grade reading level
  • 25% of parents in NYC do not read well enough to read a bedtime story to their children
  • 43% of people with the lowest literacy skills in NYC also live in poverty
  • Poverty, lined to illiteracy, is intergenerational and remains an easily curable social illness

Click here to donate to Literacy Partners.


Goodie bag



Kurt Hoelting, Letter to the Editor, Yale Alumni Magazine, May/June 2008

2008.05.19 @ 08:33
Self-transformation must accompany efforts to change the world.  The need for a “change of heart” is difficult to quantify, and so is typically left out of most public policy manifestos.  But without it, we only pretend to be at the controls of our intellectualized culture, forever moving around the external pieces — whether of the market economy or the political process or the academic orientation — without ever having to make real changes in the ways we actually live our lives.  This inner obligation to transform our own lives need not be at the expense of our efforts to change societal systems.  Quite the contrary.  But in my experience this obligation does call forth some dimension of — for lack of a better phrase — spiritual discipline and practice.  As the Dalai Lama has put it, “Spiritual practice involves, on the one hand, acting out of concern for others’ well being.  On the other hand, it entails transforming ourselves so that we become more readily disposed to do so.”

– Kurt Hoelting, Clinton WA

Where’s that Polar HRM …

2008.05.05 @ 19:42

Was chatting with my father today about the next steps in my career.

Well, kid, you only get so many heartbeats.


The philosophy of information infrastructure

2008.04.12 @ 11:19

It just occurred to me while jamming my Saturday morning sunny-side-ups down my gullet that just as the way in which cities are built and designed reflects the philosophical underpinnings of said urban architects –

Moses wanted to keep the people who couldn’t afford their own private cars off of parkways like the Hutch; those scenic views were the provenance of the wealthy (read: white) hence bridges with low overpasses

– so too is the way in which databases and online communities are built a reflection of the philosophies of said DBAs.

  • Which nuggets of information are valuable?
  • How will we determine who qualifies to see what?
  • How do we measure and evaluate our fellow humans?

I am wondering if there are any academic explorations of these themes.  (Relationship between the philosophy of built communities and the philosophy of database structure, notions of the worldviews information database design, etc.)

Has anyone seen anything that pushes this further?  I’d like to know what the prevailing theories are.

Information becomes knowledge becomes understanding becomes wisdom.

(NB:  each of those “becomes” is actually a “becomes subscript n, becomes subscript n+1″ etc.; note that the fxn “becomes” will not be defined at this time.)

Okay, back to my protein.  Anyone up for a swim at the NYSC on 49th and Broadway later?

xoxoRKP!

2008.04.06 @ 17:26

Meet my big sister, an outraged woman!

Words don’t capture my pride.

Dept. of Petitions I’ll Never Start

2008.03.25 @ 18:26

Um, why come they don’t just print a subway map on the front and back of our metro cards?

ANP stock footage of Metro Norff

Shout-out and thank you to New York magazine for their recent direct mail solicitation.  I needed to update my furry, pulp-y wallet subway line map card.

Three equations; four unknowns

2008.03.05 @ 00:22
  • I have been thinking about letting strangers stay in my apartment when I’m away on bidness in exchange for them doing my laundry and my dishes.
  • But when I go to the grocery store, I only like to buy as much as I can carry with my own two hands.  Not even a gramma cart.  (This is the kind of radicalism I embraced post-automobile!)
  • And, I am happiest when traversing landmass that I can traverse with my own two legs.
    • I recognize that this post is “ability”-centric but for the sake of argument allow me to press on like a Lee nail.
  • I feel strongly that the atomization and rationalization and systematization and productionalization of our society has resulted in
    • (a) man’s alienation from self as warned by Marxenfelden
    • (b) one dimensionality as warned by Marcusowitz
    • (c) Byzantinio 2.0 as warned by Kafkafkaf
  • I’m not saying it’s going to be Zamyatin-land but should society continue to march triumphantly on as it has, then the post-technology era might very well be WE, oui?
  • Okay, so, like, we are all a bunch of productivity units in this post-agrarian age
  • And maximizing productivity instead of joy results in, uh,  A LACK OF MAXIMUM JOY
  • Okay, so, rather than outsourcing activities that I cannot do myself …
  • Shouldn’t I just pare down my life to only include activities that I can do myself?
  • But what about the core competency stuff?!?
  • And what about being social and working with others?  Doesn’t that involve an exchange of some sort?
  • But why can’t I simply exchange joy?
  • Why do I have to be so good at process engineering in my professional life?
  • Does my desire to process engineer my personal life mean that I am forever destined to NOT MAXIMIZE JOY but instead MAXIMIZE LOADS OF LAUNDRY WASHED?
  • Should I take the fact that I keep losing stuff as a sign from the universe?
    • A sign that reads, maybe with a few lights out but enough on to keep things legible, SLOW DOWN ANP.  DO LESS.  IS MORE.  IS MAXIMIZE JOY.
  • When did that sign become an Eastern European immigrant?
  • Does this mean I need to get rid of my Polish lady?
  • And didn’t I already blog about this?!?

Dept. of twisted panties

2008.02.25 @ 12:52

ANP’s admissions of political confusion couched as political certainty have resulted in a few longtime listeners, first time commenters to come out of the woodwork!

Too bad I forgot to apply Aruban deodorant sensation Odorono in scent Fresh Bamboo this morning.  All this excitement is making me sweaty.

Discuss (capital D)

2008.02.25 @ 00:16

Hilary won’t get the Democratic nomination because if Democrats were rational and valued qualities like experience, ability to execute, and the manner in which a leader solves problems over things like style, how one looks in a suit, and that which makes one feel warm and fuzzy …

Well, then, wouldn’t they be less likely to consider themselves Democrats, capital D?

(ANP ducks for cover.) 

An upside to SOX

2008.02.12 @ 13:18

When I was at The Bank, a swarm of pen-clicking auditors descended on my pack-ratty cubicle to Taylorize my every move.

  • What was my process for making sure affiliates didn’t steal artwork from Zurich museums?
  • Which word list did I consult whilst subtly insulting certain colleagues via email?
  • How, exactly, did I sort and organize all the trees that came out of the printer?

All this documentation was necessary to ensure Sarbanes Oxley compliance.  We can’t have pussy cats obscuring card art, after all, lest a consumer complain when her credit card arrived in its welcome pack without an actual kitten.

Annoying as it was, I can’t lie, I secretly liked it.  I love engineering processes and checklists and forms.  For routinized, predictable tasks, nothing pleases me more than the transparency of a well-documented list, embedded macros optional.  It helps when people outside your direct line of work start poking around; you’re already armed with the documentation you need to tell them to stop being an idiot educate them about what it is that you do and why they should shut the how that benefits them in the long run.

Documentation also allows for cross-franchise efficiency.  I am squirming in my seat right now and must use the word amortize, because that’s what process transparency does within an organization:  it allows a knowledge worker the opportunity to amortize the routinized aspects of their jobs across different silos within a complex organization.  (At least, in theory.)

I wish, then, that auditors would come and demand some Visio flowcharts from our gubmint.  If we could just take a step back, look at the carnival blinking lights that is our obscenely large government, cross-check various programs and align them against their ultimate goal (reduce poverty, stop abuse, prevent the munchies), perhaps we’d be able to identify some effort duplication and thus, opportunities for streamlining.

I understand the intense effort that this would involve, how much time it would take, etc. etc.  And I know that budget line complications would give some pooh-poohers the chance to say, arms skyward, “There’s no way in hell we can operationalize this.”  And yet, when my crazy little slice of the earth at The Bank had to hit multiple budget lines, we ultimately figured out how to git ‘er done.  And the effort was worth it.

When I think about the machinery that undergirds so many of the services etc. that we take for granted, I can’t help but think it’s a good idea to occasionally peek under the hood and make sure it’s built real good.

And anyway, wouldn’t transparency be a good thing?  Wouldn’t a nice deck teeming with 3 pt. bold black lines around boxes that point to other boxes give way to more strong minds collaborating and considering more efficient means to achieve the stated end?